Paste any text and get a Humanity Score out of 100. Analyses sentence length variation, rhythm, transition words, and patterns that make AI-generated text sound robotic.
A Humanity Score measures how natural and human-written a piece of text sounds. It analyses sentence length variation, vocabulary richness, transition word usage, passive voice density, and AI filler phrases. A score above 80 means the text flows naturally like human writing.
Vary your sentence lengths — mix short punchy sentences with longer flowing ones. Remove filler phrases like "it is worth noting" and "delve into". Use active voice, add personal observations, and break up repetitive word patterns.
Common AI writing patterns include: uniform sentence lengths, overuse of transition words like "furthermore" and "moreover", filler phrases like "in today's fast-paced world", excessive use of words like "leverage", "streamline", "robust", and "cutting-edge", and high passive voice density.
The tool analyses sentence length standard deviation (variation), type-token ratio (vocabulary richness), passive voice markers, AI filler phrase density, and transition word frequency. It combines these metrics into a Humanity Score out of 100.
Scores above 80 indicate natural, human-sounding writing. Scores of 60-79 are mostly natural with some AI patterns. Scores of 40-59 have mixed signals. Below 40 suggests heavily templated or AI-generated writing.
This tool analyses stylistic patterns and flow, not AI detection per se. It flags writing that sounds robotic regardless of whether it was written by a human or AI. It is a flow and readability checker, not a plagiarism or AI detection tool.
Use short sentences after long ones, start sentences in different ways, replace passive voice with active constructions, remove stock phrases, and write conversationally. Reading your text aloud is the fastest way to catch robotic patterns.